Literature Review Paper Literature review paper One of the main learning exercises in the course is a Literature review paper. The literature review paper’s purpose is to answer a significant clinical question. Most of your discussions and activities in this course are created to build the skills need it to write this paper. To do this paper you need to work each week on assignments, that will help you build your skills for the successful completion of this assignment. Your paper should be 5-6 pages long (double-spaced, 12 font) not including the references and title page). You should have a reference page of at least eight (8) academic sources, including at least five (5) primary research sources that specifically answer the review question. Use APA format for references and citations. All papers must be submitted to be reviewed for similarity, any paper with a score of 20% or higher in the similarity index, will receive an automatic “0”, and will not be reviewed until the similarity score is below 20%. Step by step directions and a rubric is posted below. After your paper has been corrected and graded, you have the option to revise your literature review paper in order to improve your writing and correct your mistakes. If there is a significant improvement, the grade will be increased. Revisions are due a week after receiving feedback. Instructions: Your paper needs to follow the following criteria: 1. Choose a problem faced by clients in your practice area that you think is important and would like to learn more about (Use Activity 1 to identify the problem). 2. Use your knowledge of PICO to develop a well-built narrow clinical question. For example: In adult patients with total hip replacements (P), how effective is pain medication (I) compared to aerobic stretching (C) in controlling postoperative pain (O)? (the development of the PICO question should not be included in the paper) (Use discussion 2 & 3). 3. Write a five (5) to six (6) page literature review paper on the standing knowledge of the chosen question. 4. Include a minimum of five (5) journal articles, at least three (3) from nursing journals. However, make sure that the (5) journals are the ones analyzed and synthesized in the results and discussion sections. 5. The body of the paper should be made of the following titled sections: Title (introduction), Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. 6. Provide a specific and concise tentative title for your literature review paper (You may use the results or at least the variables in the title). 7. The abstract is not required 8. Include a 1-page introduction of your topic (background information), the focus/aim of your review. The introduction should include a statement of the problem, briefly explain the significance of your topic study, and act to introduce the reader to your definitions and background. Must include your main statement (i.e. the purpose of this review is…{PICO Question}). 9. The method section should include sources, databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria, levels of evidence, and other information that establishes credibility to your paper (Use discussion 4 & 5). 10. The results should summarize the findings of studies that have been conducted on your topic. For each study, you should briefly explain its purpose, procedure for data collection, and major findings. This is the section where you will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of studies (Use discussion 6 and activity 2). 11. Submit a table of the studies as per the matrix development (see discussion 7). 12. The discussion should be like a conclusion portion of an essay paper. It serves as a summary of the body of your literature review and should highlight the most important findings. Your analysis should help you to draw conclusions. In this section, you would discuss any consensus or disagreement on the topic. It can also include any strengths and weaknesses in general of the research area. If you believe there is more to research, you may include that here. 13. Finally, you will need to conclude your paper. At this point, you have put substantial effort into your paper. Close this chapter with a summary of the paper, major findings, and any major recommendations for the profession. 14. In general, your paper should show a sense of direction and contain a definite central idea supported with evidence. The writing should be logical, and the ideas should be linked together in a logical sequence. The ideas need to be put together clearly for the writer and for the reader. 15. Papers will be graded by rubric. When preparing to work on an assignment it is a good idea to review the rubric for the assignment. The rubric identifies the important points that will be graded as well as the description of the information that should be provided to receive all of the points in each section of the assignment. Reviewing the rubric before you begin a paper and then once again as you complete the paper will give you confidence that you included the required information and will receive maximum points for each section. See the grading rubric for this assignment. 16. Format references and citations using APA guidelines. 17. View Calendar for the due date. Rubric Formal Paper – Literature Review Formal Paper – Literature Review Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Articles (5 points) • You must provide five research articles that specifically answer the clinical question. • You may use additional professional resources for the paper such as statistical reports, and other research articles for the introduction, background, and the discussion section. • You can find more information about the difference between research and review articles in lesson 3. • Research articles can be randomized control trials, cohort studies, case control studies, cross-sectional studies, case series or reports, qualitative studies, secondary research, or basic science research, narrative reviews, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle (5 Points The title is descriptive of the question or findings results of the review. Ratings 5 pts Outstanding Identifies and uses five or more “directly relevant” peer-reviewed primary research journal articles published in the last five years. 3 pts Acceptable Identifies at least five peer-reviewed, primary research journal articles to answer the review question. However, uses less than four studies to answer the review question or uses some studies published before the fiver year requirement without justification. 5 pts Outstanding Writes a clear and concise paper title. The title reflects the main topic of the literature review 3 pts Acceptable Writes a good title that is reasonably clear and concise. However, it does not precisely describe the topic or the purpose of the paper. 0 pts Unacceptable Identifies less than fiv reviewed, primary rese journal articles. The ar not used to answers th question. Articles are or use articles that are research. 0 pts Unacceptable Writes “Literature Review paper title and does not in information that guides th the topic or purpose of the Formal Paper – Literature Review Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction: 1. Establishes the topic’s importance/ background. (5 points) • Define the topic of your study and provide any background information that helps your reader to understand the topic. Ratings 5 pts Outstanding the introduction covers relevant and current articles in detail. Only scholarly articles are used to build the argument for the need for the review. 3 pts Acceptable The introduction covers many statements that identify the importance of the topic. However, very limited support for the seriousness of the problem is evident. 5 pts Outstanding Introduces and provides the groundwork to the laid the direction of the review. Presents statistical data to establish why the topic is important ( incidence, prevalence, mortality, cost). Defines key terms to help the reader understand the topic. 3 pts Acceptable Describe the overall problem, challenge, or topic of the review. However, the writer presents more than one topic and does not present statistical data to support its relevance. Key terms are defined vaguely. • Explain your reason (perspective or significance) for reviewing the literature on this topic. 0 pts Unacceptable An introduction and does not est problem’s depth consequences, a importance. • State your inquiry question for this review. This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2. Problem Statement (5 points) Describe your problem and its significance in words. Provide a background of the problem. 0 pts Unacceptable Vaguely states inconsis direction and topic of th Does not explain why a review must be conduc writer does not present data to convey the impo the topic. Do not define key terms Formal Paper – Literature Review Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3. Inquiry Question (5 Points) This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome4. Purpose of the Paper (5 Points) Ratings 5 pts Outstanding Builds develop, and format an inquire question paragraph using well- build PICO (do not use the PICO, but the proposed question). Uses a narrow foreground question in its approach. 5 pts Outstanding Explicitly writes the paper’s purpose, uses a statement that has an action verb (describe, analyze, compare, synthesize). 3 pts Acceptable Develops and formats an inquiry question from a PICO question. However, it is not written in a paragraph format. The inquiry question is a broad background question and may not be feasible to answer using a small-scale literature review. 3 pts Acceptable Describes the paper’s purpose briefly uses action verbs in the purpose statement (describe, analyze, compare, synthesize). However, the purpose is not explicit. 0 pts Unacceptable Does not developed question from a PIC question. Uses a br background questio not be feasible for a using a small-scale review. 0 pts Unacceptable Writes a purpose that is neith nor explicit makes vague ref the topic or purpose of the re statement, do not use action (describe, analyze, compare, It isn’t very clear. Formal Paper – Literature Review Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies the Methodology for Searching the Evidence (10 points) • A comprehensive description of how the review was executed • Description of the search strategy, the selection of databases used with justification, and the search terms used. • Specifies selection rules, including inclusive and exclusion criteria. • Identifies levels of evidence and why these sources were used in the review. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults Section 1. Analysis of Findings (10 points) The results section characterizes the body of literature included in the review and synthesizes the findings. Ratings 10 pts Outstanding Concisely details and provides information about the article selection, including search engines used, search terms (keywords), and inclusion/exclusion criteria. In addition, the number and type of articles included are clearly stated. Levels of evidence are acknowledged and applied to the search. 5 pts Acceptable Provides details about article selection. Unfortunately, they were occasionally omitting some of the article selection procedures. Keywords are included, but there is no mention of the quality or the levels of the evidence found. 0 pts Unacceptable Provides a few det article selection. T and type of article included. Keyword omitted. The reade to duplicate the art selection. There is of the quality or th evidence found. 10 pts Outstanding Search and select five or more relevant journals for review. Uses articles that are interrelated and build upon each other to show the reader the state of knowledge of the topic. 5 pts Acceptable Search and select five journals for review. However, two or more journals are not clearly interrelated and do not answer the review question. 0 pts Unacceptable Search and selec Critical details n understand how was conducted a Formal Paper – Literature Review Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2. Synthesis of evidence (10 points) This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3. Tables (5 points) This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion Section (5 points) 1. Significance and synthesis of findings • The discussion summarizes the body of your literature review and highlights the most important findings (in your opinion). Ratings 10 pts Outstanding Synthesize each article by its study design. For example, sampling strategy(inclusion/ exclusion criteria), study setting, data collection procedures, the approach used for data analyses, and limitations. 5 pts Acceptable Describes the study methods for each article superficially, but information regarding nuances of how the study was conducted is limited. There is some explanation of the study method, sampling, and collection procedures. However, it lacks proper identification and use of the research terminology. 0 pts Unaccept Sections s design, pr measures/ instrumen approach a 5 pts Outstanding The table is present and is labeled correctly. The table is consistent and provides details that synthesize the review’s primary data. Therefore, the table is presented in APA criteria. 3 pts Acceptable The table is present, correctly labeled. However, there is repetition and redundancy. It follows APA but shows two or more APA guidelines errors. 0 pts Unacceptable The table does no established criter format. Therefor does not present 5 pts Outstanding The table is present and is labeled correctly. The table is consistent and provides details that synthesize the review’s primary data. Therefore, the table is presented in APA criteria. 3 pts Acceptable The table is present, correctly labeled. However, there is repetition and redundancy. It follows APA but shows two or more APA guidelines errors. 0 pts Unacceptable The table does no established criter format. Therefor does not present Formal Paper – Literature Review Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2. Limitations This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion Section (5 points) 3. Nursing Practice Relevance This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion (5 points) • Summarize the main findings from the articles • Conclude your paper by connecting your inquiry question back to the context of the problem of the review. • Includes the “so-what factor.” Ratings 5 pts Outstanding Describes studies limitations and compares results to other research publications 3 pts Acceptable Provides a brief and general discussion of the study’s limitations but does not compare to other research publications. 5 pts Outstanding Nursing practice relevance of the topic area is clearly stated. In addition, the importance of the review itself and how its findings may address/inform nursing is stated 5 pts Acceptable Writes most paragraphs with an identifiable topic. Some sections include more than one topic. 3 pts Acceptable Nursing relevance is superficially discussed. It does superficially mention how the findings inform nursing. 3 pts Outstanding Writes all paragraphs with a precise identifiable topic. 0 pts Unacceptable Does not provid of literature rev limitations. 0 pts Unacceptabl Poor discussi implications findings for n practice. 0 pts Unacceptable Writes many paragraphs lackin identifiable topic sentences. Ma contain multiple topics and are to follow. Formal Paper – Literature Review Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality and Organization (3 points) 1. Paragraphs (5 points) Logical arrangement of supporting points in coherent paragraphs; Effective transitions. Format and outline are appropriate for the academic manuscript. All assigned elements include a correctly formatted APA title page and reference page. Consistent APA format and citations throughout the paper This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality and Organization (3 points) 2. Organization This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality and Organization (3 points) 3. The logical flow of ideas Ratings 3 pts Outstanding Summarizes and articulates clearly the main points of the review. It was recognized that implications for nursing practice are logical, relevant, and straightforward. Provides specific suggestions for future research. 2 pts Acceptable Summarizing the main points, clarity could be enhanced by recognizing the Implications for nursing practice. It makes good specific suggestions for future research but needs to provide better justification for future research. 3 pts Outstanding The review was organized using subheadings. The study was suitably organized considering the contents of the selected articles. 2 pts Acceptable The review was suitably organized, considering the contents of the selected articles. 1 pts Unacceptable The review was mi organized, and the difficult to follow t 2 pts Acceptable The overall arrangement is logical but is occasionally difficult to follow. 1 pts Unacceptable The arrangement of haphazard and diffic follow. 3 pts Outstanding The reader is guided smoothly through the logically arranged paper. 1 pts Unacceptable Does not summ main points. Do identify implica nursing practice no justification suggestion for f research. Formal Paper – Literature Review Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality and Organization (3 points) 4. Mechanics This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality and Organization (3 points) 2. Organization Total Points: 100 Ratings 3 pts Outstanding There were no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors, and transitional phrases were used to guide the reader throughout the text. 3 pts Outstanding The Final paper is double spaced in a 12- point serif font, has 1inch margins, 7th Ed. APA-style headings and includes in-text citations and reference list for all citations and references. 2 pts Acceptable An occasional grammatical, spelling, and punctuation error did not distract the reader. 2 pts Acceptable The Final paper lacks some of the following features: double spacing, 12-point serif font, 1inch margins, APA style headings, or a nearly complete Version 7 APA reference list. 1 pts Unacceptable Many grammatical, and punctuation erro distracted the reader writing content. 1 pts Unacceptable The Final paper lacks the following features spacing, 12- point seri inch margins, APA sty headings, or a nearly c Version 7 APA refere
Purchase answer to see full attachment