Problem Solving (Career Relevance)

In Weeks 1 and 2, we explored the history and evolution of psychological testing and subsequent evolution of the ethical standards pertaining to psychological testing. For this assignment, you will explore a legal case that involved problems with the use of psychological assessments, particularly how the tests were biased toward diverse populations. You will also explore how the case inspired improvements in testing methods and the APA ethics code related to using assessments with diverse populations. This assessment will prepare you in your field of work by prompting you to think critically about the legal aspects of psychological testing and to gain the ability to critique the appropriateness of psychological assessments for diverse populations. In your field, you may have to apply what you have learned if you are tasked to conduct psychological testing.

Imagine your manager has asked you to research cases about psychological testing. Your company wants to explore the implications of psychological testing for diverse populations and require more information prior to conducting psychological assessments. Your manager has asked you to present a written analysis of these legal cases to collaborators.

Select and research a legal case or issue related to testing from the following list:

• Larry P. vs. Riles (1979)
• Hobson vs. Hanson (1967)
• Griggs vs. Duke Power Company (1971)
• Albermarle Paper Company vs. Moody (1976)
• Allen vs. District of Columbia (1993) (referred to in textbook)
• Use of aptitude tests (i.e., SAT or ACT) for gaining college admissions (referred to in textbook)

Write a 1,250- to 1,400-word analysis report in which you:

• Discuss the background of your selected case and the legal implications of the decision or a description of the issue related to testing.
• Discuss biases in the assessments in the case and factors that led to the biases (i.e., the role of test norms creating bias).
• Discuss the ethical implications for diverse populations in relation to the case integrating information from Section 9 of the ethics code. How did the controversy lead to improvements in the ethics code to reduce discrimination?