In the first paragraph identify the set of sculptures that were chosen and which of those two appealed to you the most. This is your opinion but don’t use the terminology in this opening. But, remember that you will be referring to it later. You may even want to develop this part last. Avoid using the word details in this opening statement.

In the second paragraph choose one of the sculptures and discuss both implied and actual texture. The discussion of texture only needs to be applied to one of the sculptures. Remember that all things have actual textures (textures that really exist and can be felt). In sculpture these actual textures are more prevalent and relevant than in paintings. Many sculptures also have implied textures – those that can be imagined because of how the work is presented, but would not feel that way if we actually touched the sculpture.

In the third paragraph identify the sculpture that was not used for texture and apply a sculpture term to it. There were several other sculpture terms identified within the sculpture lecture and reinforcement (contrapposto, patina, tableau, etc.) Do not use medium or technique unless how it impacts the subbject matter can be successfully applied. You may want to select this one before selecting the one to which you will apply implied texture. Do not use relief, undercut, or ‘in the round’ for this part as they are covered in other parts of the assignment.

In the fourth paragraph identify which of the sculptures is ‘in relief’ and determine whether it is in low relief or high relief. Make sure you know how to identify the types of relief. Give rationale for your choice. Then, discuss how viewing the sculpture ‘in the round’ communicates differently from the one ‘in relief’. Do NOT just state that it can be seen from various points of view. Rather discuss how that fact makes this particular sculpture communicate differently in some way.

In the last paragraph choose terminology from your post. Discuss how it reinforces your opening statement. If you cannot discuss how it reinforces your opening statement, then adjust your opening statement to make that application easier. But, do not use the terminology in that opening statement. Use it in the closing one.

attachment
sculpture.html

Biology
1) Overview and definition of the immune system. The chart on p 486, Fig 24.1A, “An overview of animal immune systems,” is a good visual to use in the overview.

2) Provide comparisons of the invertebrate and vertebrate systems. You will note that all animals have “innate immunity,” but only vertebrates have “acquired/adaptive immunity.”

3) Discuss next the lymphatic organ system, which is the organ system that is involved in BOTH innate and acquired immunity.

4) Address the different types and processes of acquired immunity. This will include: response to specific invaders; lymphocytes (humoral immune response and cell mediated response, including Helper T cells and Cytotoxic T cells); antigens (clonal selection process); and antibodies (weapons of humoral immune response). Not necessarily in this order….HINT: Use the Chapter Review, p. 502, to help you organize this section on acquired immunity.

5) Finally, address health issues, which will include “Disorders of the immune system,” pp 500-501 (autoimmune diseases/examples, immunodeficiency diseases/examples, allergies). Give a list and description of each.1
http://www.acemyhomework.com/download.php?f=649653775.zip

Description
Users/jehadmegdad/Downloads/Final?Prompt?5.docx
make?it?simple?we?have?5?essays?and?10?journals?in?the?semester
English 1100: FYC
Final Prompt: An Advice Letter to Future Students
After reviewing your writing and work this semester, compose a brief welcome and advice letter of 500-750 words (approximately 2-3 double spaced pages) directed at future students in English 1100. You can use a tone that would be appropriate of a letter, which means this doesn?t have to be academic writing?it can absolutely be more conversational. In this letter, share with these future students what you?ve learned in the course and advice you have for them as they undertake the (sometimes dreaded!) first-year composition requirement. Some questions you might touch on (though feel free to ignore these questions and just write from your own ideas and experiences too):
a. What kind of writing does this class ask students to undertake?
b. What is both satisfying and challenging about this writing?
c. What assignment was your favorite and why? Least favorite? Essays was my favorite and journals was least
d. More than the just the assignments, how have you grown and changed as a writer?
e. What you have you learned that will stick with you?
f. How have your ideas about writing (and language use and literacy more generally) changed in this course? How is that change reflected in your writing?
g. What advice would you offer future students so they succeed in this course?

? We will not be drafting this paper or conducting peer review in class (as the remainder of our time will be devoted to the Critical Literacy Narrative), so please do not hesitate to get in touch with me if you want to discuss this final assignment.

? We will not be meeting during finals week; this assignment is intended to take the place of that session. ?

Topic: Criterion Theory and Development

I/O Project Part I

Details:

Your assignments in this class will take place in two parts. In Part 1, you will choose a topic that you may use for your dissertation. You will discuss the theoretical foundations found within the literature to support the topic and suggest why this topic should be studied and the possible research questions your proposed study will answer. Although the 10 Key Strategic Points may inform your paper, this paper will not be your prospectus.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a rubric that is ATTACHED. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the work to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Use the Proquest Dissertations and Theses @ Grand Canyon University link located on the database page at GCU Library to research/explore other GCU learner dissertations that have a topic similar to the one you have chosen.
Review the 10 Key Strategic Points template located in the DC Network.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments.
Use academic sources, including peer-reviewed journal articles, scholarly books, government reports, and other instructor-approved texts.
Include a minimum of five scholarly topic-relevant sources (majority of articles should be published within past 5 years)
Directions:

Using current empirical sources (i.e., published within past 5 years) to write a paper of 2,000-2,250 words in which you address the following issues:

Choose an I-O topic of interest that you intend to use for your dissertation and delineate why it is important for the discipline of I-O psychology to study this topic.
Identify the gap in the literature that your study will fill and discuss the problem you will address through the study.
Identify the theoretical foundations (e.g., model or theory) and seminal author(s) of the model or theory.
Discuss how the identified problem will be understood:
Identify the questions your study will answer.

Describe the location of your study.

Define variables (for a quantitative study) or phenomenon (for a qualitative study).

RESOURCES

Course Contents

Textbook

1. Industrial/Organizational Psychology: Understanding the Workplace

Read Chapter 4.

http://gcumedia.com/digital-resources/bedford-freeman-and-worth/2012/industrial-organizational-psychology_ebook_4e.php

Electronic Resource

1. DC Network

Use the 10 Key Strategic Points template found under the Research/Dissertation tab to inform your assignment. You may also find other materials that are helpful, specifically under the Residency tab in Research/Dissertation.

http://dc.gcu.edu

e-Library Resource

1. Constructing Validity: Basic Issues in Objective Scale Development

Read:

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(2), 309-319.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=1996-93318-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site

2. Has Item Response Theory Increased the Validity of Achievement Test Scores?

Read:

Linn, R. L. (1990). Has item response theory increased the validity of achievement test scores? Applied Measurement in Education, 3(2), 114-141.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=7364295&site=ehost-live&scope=site

3. Measurement Error in Psychological Research: Lessons From 26 Research Scenarios

Read:

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 199–223.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=1996-04469-008&site=ehost-live&scope=site

4. Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation

Read:

Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496-515.

http://search.proquest.com/docview/210943940?accountid=7374

5. SAGE Research Methods

Use Sage Research Methods to research potential resources to develop the theoretical foundations for your paper.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://srmo.sagepub.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/cases

6. The Role of Factor Analysis in the Development and Evaluation of Personality Scales

Read:

Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54(1), 106-148.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=8970518&site=ehost-live&scope=site

attachment
PSY-830_Module3IP.docx
attachment
GradeRubric.html

Respond to the following: Answer each discussion(X2). Include at least 2 references from Babbie, E. (2017). The Basics of Social Research 7th Ed. Boston: Cengage Learning ONLY.

A good response to a written question should combine your personal experiences with theory to support your work. Be thoughtful and insightful and it must demonstrate critical thinking and analysis. A good response to the question should be about 3-4 paragraphs, and address all of the issues that are raised. (Introduction, body and conclusion.) Thank you.

· Chapter 8: Experiments

· Chapter 9: Survey Research

· Chapter10: Qualitative Field Research

M5D1: Experiments

We will discuss the differences between different types of experiments

1. Explain how a natural experiment differs from a traditional one by providing an example of each and discussing the differences. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each? Which design do you think is most useful and why?

M5D2: Surveys & Field Research

We will discuss how the various types of surveys can be applied to your research proposal.

2. Of the four types of survey methods discussed in the text – self-administered questionnaire, interview survey, telephone survey and online survey – discuss how each might be applied to your research proposal. Based upon your research question/hypothesis, what do you think would be the most appropriate method of conducting a survey? Why?

My topic proposal is:

Crime and Mental Illness. What can be learned about how mental illness influences whether or not someone is likely to commit crimes? Are certain mental illnesses more prone to criminal behavior?