Global Climate Change and Health

/in /by

4 pages_environment due tonight
Assignment: Global Climate Change and Health
The environment (both home and physical) has a significant influence on health, as you saw in the readings and media presentations for this week. You also read about the ramifications of global climate change on health. For the purpose of this Assignment, consider the implications of global climate change on health now and in the future.
For this Assignment, review the following:
Write a 4-page paper that addresses the following:
 Describe two health care concerns related to global climate change.
o Topics could include increased exposure to vectors that transmit Zika, West Nile virus, or malaria; respiratory problems; food distribution problems due to drought or lack of water; or heat-related illness.
 Compare concerns in the United States related to these topics with one developed and one developing country.
 Describe health promotion/health protection strategies a nurse could implement.
 Support your ideas with references from the professional nursing literature.
Required Readings/Resources
Holtz, C. (2017). Global health care: Issues and policies (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
 Chapter 14, “Global Perspectives on Nutrition” (pp. 381-414)
 Chapter 15, “Global Perspectives on Environmental Health” (pp. 419-439)
Stanhope, M., & Lancaster, J. (2016). Public health nursing: Population-centered health care in the community (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
· Chapter 10, “Environmental Health” (pp. 217–241)
Public Health Nursing: Population-Centered Health Care in the Community, 9th Ed. by Stanhope, M., & Lancaster, J. Copyright 2015 by Elsevier Health Science Books. Reprinted by permission of Elsevier Health Science Books via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Veenema, T. G., Griffin, A., Gable, A. R., MacIntyre, L., Simons, N., Couig, M. P., … Larson, E. (2016). Nurses as leaders in disaster preparedness and response—A call to action. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 48(2), 187–200.
Required Media
Laureate Education. (Producer). (2010a). Public and global health: Global emergencies and disasters [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
TED. (2015a). Why climate change is a threat to human rights. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/mary_robinson_why_climate_change_is_a_threat_to_human_rights
Former President of Ireland, Mary Robinson, talks about the effects of climate change on human rights in poorer populations where some islands or lowlands are beginning to submerge as sea waters rise.
TED. (2016b). The case for optimism on climate change. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/al_gore_the_case_for_optimism_on_climate_change
Former Vice President Al Gore speaks practically about global warming and offers some reasons we should feel optimistic about recent developments and changes in outcomes. His message is that people are changing their attitudes about global warming into action to stop the warming trend.

The post 4 pages_environment due tonight appeared first on ExpertCustomWritings.
Assignment status: Solved by our Experts.

1. Discuss the development of parenting skills

/in /by

Please focus on the topics listed and the attached guidance for this assignment.**

Pregnancy and Birth: Stages in the Life Cycle

Using Kolb’s (4) areas of model Learning please address the following subtopics related to Preganacy and Birth: Stages in the Cycle of Life:

1. Discuss the development of parenting skills

2. Discuss parental values and attitudes that accompany stages in the development of the child

3. Analyze methods of effective guidance

4. Discuss the role of discipline; compare and contrast discipline with punishment

5. Discuss constructive and destructive elements in parenting styles; identify at least three categories of parenting styles; include an overview of the parenting behaviors associated with each style and the results obtained from each

6. Discuss the challenges to responsible and effective parenting presented by contemporary society

attachment
three-credit-essay-template3.docx
attachment
Template.zip

Assignment 4-2

/in /by

Curriculum Development Issue Paper

Details:
Read “Reconceptualizing Program Outcomes” and “Leveling EBP Content for Undergraduate Nursing Students” for a better understanding of issues within curriculum development.

Select an issue within curriculum development that is of interest to you.

Write a paper of 1,000-1,250 words on the issue, discussing its affect and relevance to nursing, staff or patient education.

Why is this issue a problem at your place of employment?
What are your proposed strategies to resolve these issues?
Use at least three to five scholarly, peer-reviewed resources less than 5 years old in addition to the course materials. Make sure that you do not use the two sources given in this assignment.

English Mod 4 Discussion

/in /by

How do you feel about “giving back” or “paying it forward?” Despite your own everyday difficulties and responsibilities, have you ever asked yourself, “How can I help?” Have you any experiences to share? Consider some of the many ways that one can “pay it forward” and share them here with your fellow students. Please note that many ways are so simple! Smiles and thumbs up are free!

2. Reflecting on the four modules completed this session, provide suggestions and advice to those taking this course in subsequent sessions. What would you have done differently a second time around? The same? If your goal is to provide the necessary tools for success for your fellow student, think of the top five suggestions and explain each with specific details and examples from the course.

Each questions needs to be 250 words.

Advance practice nursing 4

/in /by

Advance practice nursing
1. Describe a situation or conversation in which there was a conflict between a nurse or advanced practice nurse and another healthcare provider or administrator.
2. Write a 2 to 3 page paper on how you would apply the Twelve Skills to have a positive communication outcome.
Your paper must be presented in a single Word document. The paper must be between 2 to 3 pages in length not including the title and reference list pages. The paper must use proper APA Publication Manual 6th Edition formatting including title page running head and reference list with properly formatted citations in the body of the paper.

Genetic engineering and medicine

/in /by

Field: Biology

Report Issue
Choose one of the following topics and write a 400-500 word essay. You must cite at least 2 primary sources. Follow the proper citation format

(Links to an external site.)

Links to an external site.

for articles and or websites

(Links to an external site.)

Links to an external site.

. You must use direct (primary) sources of information (i.e., not Wikipedia or news articles). The essay must have the following sections: accurate title, 3-sentence abstract, introductory paragraph, 2-3 body paragraphs, conclusion, references. The entire essay should be less than 525 words; that includes everything. You will get a point deducted for going over the word limit, and 1 point each for missing any of the required sections listed above.

For all topics, you must write at least 1 paragraph that is 100% your own personal insight.

1. Genetic engineering and medicine

Choose one disease that has been cured by genetic engineering.

Briefly describe the disease; evaluate the cure.

2. Therapeutic cloning

Describe a disease that is caused by a malfunctioning gene and can be cured by gene therapy.

3. Genetic engineering and agriculture

Find an engineered agricultural crop or livestock.

Discuss the pro’s and con’s and any ethical concerns.

4. Reproductive cloning and conservation of endangered species

Find examples and discuss concerns.

5. Stem cell therapy

Find a disease that has been cured by this therapy.

What are some of the issues around stem cell therapy?

Please remember to use your own words and check for spelling and grammatical errors. The Turnitin results will always show some level of matching, but there should never be complete sentences and sections that are not from your own writing. Practice rephrasing and synthesizing ideas rather than transferring directly someone else’s words.

Identify a policy, not already identified by another student, that you think would bring American society closer to satisfying the principle of fair equality of opportunity.

/in /by

Field: Psychology

Report Issue
Discussion Board for Weeks 13 + 14

Please consider the following questions for this week’s discussion forum:

1. While the prospect of living forever may seem enticing, Bernard Williams argues that immortality would, in fact, be bad for us. Explain his argument, illustrating the concepts of conditional and categorical desires with your own examples. Is Williams right? Why or why not?

2. The final chapter of The Myth of Sisyphus can be read here: http://dbanach.com/sisyphus.htm (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. What do you take Camus to be arguing in this chapter? Do you find his argument to be convincing?

Discussion Board for Week 12

Rawls’ principle of fair equality of opportunity says that inequalities in the distribution of basic social goods, such as wealth and income, are justified only if equally talented and motivated people have roughly equal prospects of achieving the jobs and offices that are associated with those inequalities, regardless of their starting social circumstances (such as their race, gender, or starting social class).

Discussion questions:

1. Identify a policy, not already identified by another student, that you think would bring American society closer to satisfying the principle of fair equality of opportunity. Explain why you think that policy would help us satisfy the principle.

2. Explain one reason for thinking that we should not implement a policy that another student has identified in response to (1). You might draw on material from the lecture here, or you might offer a reason of your own.

3. Respond to an objection another student raised in response to (2) by defending the policy.

Discussion Board for Week 11
1. One of our tasks is to try to translate insights from Just War Theory, which is framed around nation-states, to questions about superheroes. What conditions do you think must hold for a nation-state to justly go to war? Can those same conditions apply for a superhero who goes to war? In particular, address carefully what it takes to have legitimacy.

2. Is there a moral difference between killing versus letting die? Why or why not?

Discussion Board for Week 10

(1) Explain one of the arguments from the lecture that tries to show that we are not morally responsible for our actions.

(2) Briefly develop an objection to that argument, or to an argument presented by another student.

(3) Briefly develop a response to that objection, or to an objection presented by another student.

Discussion Board for Week 9

What are the reasons why we might think that moral objectivism is correct? For someone who suspects that moral objectivism is wrong, what would you recommend as their best alternative account (of the ones discussed in the lectures) and why?

Why might we want to be moral relativists? Do you think that there is a way for a moral relativist to be able to convincingly respond to our intuitions that some actions are wrong (e.g. slavery), irrespective of the cultural views about that action?

Discussion Board for Week 8

1. Can we know anything about the external world? Describe the skeptical challenge to the claim that we have knowledge of the external world. How would you respond to the skeptic?

2. What sorts of ethical concerns should govern our scientific pursuits? Use specific examples of current scientific or technological research programs to discuss your answer

Discussion Board for Week 7

1. We have been given several arguments for why we might believe that God exists. Which do you think is the strongest argument available to us? Why is it the strongest argument? What might be the best way for someone who disagrees with the argument to respond?

2. The problem of evil is intended to show a conflict between our conception of God as all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful and the existence of evil in the world. Which might be the best strategy to resolve this tension? Is there a way to reconcile the kinds of evil in the world and God as originally conceived? Should we ‘weaken’ our conception of God, and think of God as perhaps less powerful, or less knowledgeable, or ‘good’ in a different sense?

Discussion Board for Week 6

1. Are possible worlds abstract or concrete objects? What reasons hold in favor of each view and which one do you believe to be the strongest?

2. Is it possible for you to travel back in time and kill your grandfather? What sense of “possibility” are you using in thinking about and answering this question?

This is the discussion forum for week 6. In order to contribute to your participation grade in the course, posts must directly engage the philosophical material from the week’s lecture. The discussion board for each week will be closed to new posts Sunday at 11:59 PM; no late posts will be accepted.

Please be respectful of other students and their views and ideas, and please contact Sean at sean_gray@hks.harvard.edu if you have concerns of any kind about the discussion board.

Here are some questions to get things rolling:

Discussion Board for Week 5
This is the discussion forum for week 5. In order to contribute to your participation grade in the course, posts must directly engage the philosophical material from the week’s lecture. The discussion board for each week will be closed to new posts Sunday at 11:59 PM; no late posts will be accepted.

Please be respectful of other students and their views and ideas, and please contact Sean at sean_gray@hks.harvard.edu if you have concerns of any kind about the discussion board.

Here are some questions to get things rolling:

1. The “functionalist” view suggests that a computer could have a mind just like ours. It could believe that Cambridge is in Massachusetts, want to live near the beach in LA, and experience pains and pleasures of various kinds. Does this consequence of functionalism seem plausible to you? Why or why not?

2. Is it possible for two people to “switch bodies”—that is, for the mind of one person to come to control the body of another, and vice versa? Could you switch bodies with LeBron James, for instance? Why or why not? Set aside whether it would be possible for us to develop the necessary technology.

Discussion Board for Week 4

This is the discussion forum for week 3. Unless you have been cleared for the alternative participation assignment, you are not required to post to the discussion board. However, it is one great way to contribute to your participation grade for the course. (The other being attending and participating in section.)

In order to contribute to your participation grade in the course, posts must directly engage the philosophical material from the week’s lecture. (E.g., a post about the Batgirl motion comic that did not engage the philosophical material from last week’s lecture would not count.) The discussion board for each week will be closed to new posts Sunday at 11:59 PM; no late posts will be accepted.

Below you will find posts to get the discussion going; feel free to respond to these if you like. Responding to them is not necessary for receiving participation credit from your post. You can also post your own questions or engage with the posts of other students.

Please be respectful of other students and their views and ideas, and please contact Sean at sean_gray@hks.harvard.edu if you have concerns of any kind about the discussion board.

Here are some questions to get things rolling:

(1) We’ve been presented with reasons to deny that lying is necessarily worse than truthful misleading. In your opinion, is lying worse than truthful misleading in some cases? All cases? Why or why not?

(2) Describe why transparency and oversight are important democratic norms. Is there ever good reason to think that these norms should not hold under certain circumstances, even for a democracy? What kind of circumstances would those be?

Discussion Board for Week 3

This is the discussion forum for week 3. Unless you have been cleared for the alternative participation assignment, you are not required to post to the discussion board. However, it is one great way to contribute to your participation grade for the course. (The other being attending and participating in section.)

In order to contribute to your participation grade in the course, posts must directly engage the philosophical material from the week’s lecture. (E.g., a post about the Batgirl motion comic that did not engage the philosophical material from last week’s lecture would not count.) The discussion board for each week will be closed to new posts Sunday at 11:59 PM; no late posts will be accepted.

Below you will find posts to get the discussion going; feel free to respond to these if you like. Responding to them is not necessary for receiving participation credit from your post. You can also post your own questions or engage with the posts of other students.

Please be respectful of other students and their views and ideas, and please contact Sean at sean_gray@hks.harvard.edu if you have concerns of any kind about the discussion board.

Here are some questions to get things rolling:

(1) What, in your opinion, is heroism? Which ethical theory reviewed in the module best captures heroism as you understand it?

(2) Describe one ethical theory addressed in the module and explain a key objection to this theory. Do you think the objection is a good one? Why or why not?

Discussion Board for Weeks 1 and 2

Weeks 1 & 2: The Philosophy of Art

This is the discussion forum for weeks 1 & 2, though it will focus on the lecture material from week 1.

A discussion forum for each week will be opened at the same time that the module for the week is released. Unless you have been cleared for the alternative participation assignment, you are not required to post to the discussion board. However, it is one great way to contribute to your participation grade for the course. (The other being attending and participating in section.)

In order to contribute to your participation grade in the course, posts must directly engage the philosophical material from the week’s lecture. (E.g., a post about the Batgirl motion comic that did not engage the philosophical material from last week’s lecture would not count.) The discussion board for each week will be closed to new posts each Sunday at 11:59 PM; no late posts will be accepted.

We will be posting questions each to get the discussion going; feel free to respond to these if you like. Responding to them is not necessary for receiving participation credit from your post. You can also post your own questions or engage with the posts of other students.

The discussion board for this week is devoted from the lecture material from last week’s lecture on aesthetics, rather than this week’s lecture on the history of superheroes. Here are some questions to get things rolling:

(1) What is art? Walk through an example that your definition seems to get right.

(2) Describe or link to an article about a borderline case of art — something that isn’t clearly art, but also isn’t clearly not art. For example, is a piece of driftwood that a famous artist picks up on the beach and then provides to a museum for display under her name art? It’s not immediately clear. (All examples should be “safe for work,” thanks!)

School of Nursing and Midwifery CHIP915 Essential Skills for Health Researchers

/in /by

Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled please refer to UOW website or eLearning for the latest version

2014_Aut_CHIP915_FINAL Page: 1 of 7

School of Nursing and Midwifery

Subject Outline

CHIP915 Essential Skills for Health Researchers – Autumn 2014

Section A: Subject Information

Credit Points: 6

Delivery Method: Flexible/Distance

Campus Locations: Wollongong

Pre-requisite(s): Nil

Co-requisite(s): Nil

Subject Contacts

Subject Coordinator/Lecturer

Name: Dr Sharon Bourgeois

Location: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Building 41, Room 111

Consultation mode and times: Availability is posted on the Moodle site

Telephone: 61 2 4221 5094

Email: sharon_bourgeois@uow.edu.au

eLearning Space

This subject has materials and activities available via eLearning. To access eLearning you must have

a UOW user account name and password, and be enrolled in the subject. eLearning is accessed via

SOLS (student online services). Log on to SOLS and then click on the eLearning link in the menu

column.

For information regarding the eLearning spaces please use the following link:

Moodle – http://uowblogs.com/moodlelab/files/2013/05/Moodle_StudentGuide-1petpo7.pdf

Learning Outcomes

On completion of this subject, students should be able to:

(a) Critically discuss concepts, processes and designs for research

(b) Critically analyse and integrate the literature relevant to a study;

(c) Formulate a researchable question

(d) Compare and contrast strengths and limitations of various research designs

(e) Identify and address ethical issues relevant to a study and an ethics application

(f) Interpret study results within the context of the research approach used and the existing body of

knowledge relevant to the study

(g) Develop a research proposal that reflects the principles of research.

Graduate Qualities

The University of Wollongong has developed five graduate qualities

(http://www.uow.edu.au/student/qualities/index.html) which it considers express valuable qualities that

are essential for UOW graduates in gaining employment and making an important contribution to

society and their chosen field. Student development of the following graduate qualities in particular

will be enhanced by their participation in this subject:

1. Informed: Have a sound knowledge of an area of study or profession and understand its

current issues, locally and internationally. Know how to apply this knowledge. Understand

how an area of study has developed and how it relates to other areas.

2. Independent learners: Engage with new ideas and ways of thinking and critically analyse

issues. Seek to extend knowledge through ongoing research, enquiry and reflection. Find and

evaluate information, using a variety of sources and technologies. Acknowledge the work and

ideas of others.

3. Problem solvers: Take on challenges and opportunities. Apply creative, logical and critical

thinking skills to respond effectively. Make and implement decisions. Be flexible, thorough,

innovative and aim for high standards.

Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled please refer to UOW website or eLearning for the latest version

2014_Aut_CHIP915_FINAL Page: 2 of 7 Last modified: 21 February 2014

4. Effective communicators: Articulate ideas and convey them effectively using a range of

media. Work collaboratively and engage with people in different settings. Recognise how

culture can shape communication.

5. Responsible: Understand how decisions can affect others and make ethically informed

choices. Appreciate and respect diversity. Act with integrity as part of local, national, global

and professional communities.

Mandatory Minimum Attendance Requirements

Distance delivery: It is expected that students will allocate 12 hours per week to this subject to

complete the study guide requirements, complete your assignments and prepare for an examination

where applicable.

Flexible delivery: Dates for study days and weeks will be listed on the Online Calendar, found via the

Subject Descriptions link on the Course Handbook page. It is expected that students will allocate 12

hours per week to this subject to complete the study guide requirements, complete your assignments

and prepare for an examination where applicable.

Lecture, Tutorial, Laboratory Times

All timetable information is subject to variation. Check the latest information on the university web

timetable via the Timetable link under Study Resources on the Current Students webpage or log into

SOLS to view your personal timetable prior to attending classes, as of publishing the following

applied.

Prescribed Readings (includes eReadings)

Polit DF & Beck CT 2012. Nursing research. Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice.

9th edn. Wolters Kluwer Health. Lippincott & Williams, Sydney

Key References

See eReadings on the elearning site for additional references (as starting references).

Recommended readings are not intended as an exhaustive list, students should use the Library

catalogue and databases to locate additional resources.

Distance students studying within Australia should refer to the information and resources found via

the Library link on the UOW homepage regarding off-campus library services available.

Distance students studying outside Australia should contact their subject coordinator, as

arrangements for library services may be available within their own country.

Textbooks and Materials to be purchased by students

Textbooks

Polit DF & Beck CT 2012. Nursing research. Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice.

9th edn. Wolters Kluwer Health. Lippincott & Williams, Sydney

Materials

Nil

Recent Changes to this Subject

Change: Revision of subject content and Moodle site activities.

Reason: To augment student learning experiences

Student Support and Advice

SMAH Central

Location: 41.152

Telephone: 61 2 4221 3492

Email: smah-students@uow.edu.au

Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled please refer to UOW website or eLearning for the latest version

2014_Aut_CHIP915_FINAL Page: 3 of 7 Last modified: 21 February 2014

Section B: Assessment

Details of Assessment Tasks

Assessment 1 Essay (Literature Review)

Format Essay

Due date 14 April 2014

Weighting 40%

Length 2000 words

Details

Literature review of a health topic of interest. Identification of a gap in the literature and

the development of a researchable question

Submission

You will submit assessments via the Turnitin assessment drop box on the subject

Moodle site. This will submit your assessment to Turnitin and you will receive a report.

Following the receipt of your Turnitin report you may revise your assessment and then

submit you final version together with the Turnitin report through the final assessment

drop box.

Complete the integrity quiz under Assessment 1 on the eLearning site which will open

the drop box for the assignment submission following successful completion of the quiz.

Name your file as follows “student email username_assignment number” (e.g.

its999_ass3). Access the eLearning space, locate the relevant drop box for the

assignment, click on , select your file, and click on .

Turnitin is Internet-based text-matching software which may be used for detecting

plagiarism at UOW. Please see the short video in Moodle which provides information

about the concept of plagiarism and the use of Turnitin in learning and writing skills.

Assessment 2 Research Proposal

Format Essay

Due date 26 May 2014

Weighting 60%

Length 2500 words

Details

Develop a justified research proposal based on the researchable question developed in

Assessment 1.

Submission

You will submit assessments via the Turnitin assessment drop box on the subject

Moodle site. This will submit your assessment to Turnitin and you will receive a report.

Following the receipt of your Turnitin report you may revise your assessment and then

submit you final version together with the Turnitin report through the final assessment

drop box.

Complete the integrity quiz under Assessment 1 on the eLearning site which will open

the drop box for the assignment submission following successful completion of the quiz.

.

Name your file as follows “student email username_assignment number” (e.g.

its999_ass3). Access the eLearning space, locate the relevant drop box for the

assignment, click on , select your file, and click on .

Turnitin is Internet-based text-matching software which may be used for detecting

plagiarism at UOW. Please see the short video in Moodle which provides information

about the concept of plagiarism and the use of Turnitin in learning and writing skills.

Assessment tasks will be marked using explicit criteria that will be provided to students prior to

submission.

Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled please refer to UOW website or eLearning for the latest version

2014_Aut_CHIP915_FINAL Page: 4 of 7 Last modified: 21 February 2014

Minimum Requirements for a Pass in this Subject

To receive a clear pass in this subject a total mark of 50% or more must be achieved. In addition,

students must meet all of the minimum performance requirements as listed below. Failure to meet any

of the minimum performance requirements is grounds for awarding a Technical Fail (TF) in the subject

even where total marks accumulated are greater than 50%.

A Technical Fail (TF) grade will be awarded for the subject even where the total marks accumulated

are 50% or higher, if one or more of the following criteria are not met:

• does not attempt all assessment tasks

Minimum Requirements: Student Participation

Students who do not meet minimum attendance requirements may be awarded a Technical Fail (TF)

for this subject.

Regular student participation is required through active engagement with activities, readings,

podcasts as posted on the Moodle site.

Students who do not meet minimum participation through engagement with the Moodle site activities

as identified by the Moodle site analytics may be awarded a technical fail (TF) for this subject.

Minimum Participation: Student participation at workshops is not an assessable component of this

course, but is highly recommended. Students who do not meet minimum participation requirements

may be awarded a Technical Fail (TF) for this subject.

Minimum requirements are:

• submit all assessments

• Actively engage with the Moodle site activities, podcasts, eReadings and other

activities (75% benchmark set based on Moodle site analytics)

Students who do not meet the overall minimum performance level requirements outlined above may

be given a Technical Fail (TF) grade on their academic transcript even where the total marks

accumulated are 50% or higher. Where a Technical Fail is awarded, the grade is displayed as TF but

a mark is not displayed on the academic transcript. For the purposes of calculating a Weighted

Average Mark (WAM) a TF is allocated a mark of 49.

Scaling

Scaling will not occur in this subject.

Late Submission

Late submission of an assessment task without an approved extension of the deadline is not

acceptable. Marks will be deducted for late submission at the rate of 5% of the total possible marks

for that particular assessment task per day. This means that if a piece of work is marked out of 100,

then the late penalty will be 5 marks per day (5% of 100 possible marks per day). The formula for

calculating the late penalty is the total possible marks x 0.05 x number of days late. For example:

Student A submits an assignment which is marked out of 100. The assignment is submitted 7 days

late. This means that a late penalty of 35 marks will apply (100 x 0.05 x 7). The assignment is marked

as per normal out of 100 and is given a mark of 85/100, and then the late penalty is applied. The

result is that the student receives a final mark of 50/100 for the assignment (85 (original mark) – 35

marks (late penalty) = 50/100 (final mark)).

Student B submits a report which is marked out of 20. The report is submitted three days late. This

means that a late penalty of 3 marks will apply ((20 x 0.05 x 3). The report is marked as per normal

out of 20 and is given a mark of 17/20, and then the late penalty is applied. The result is that the

student receives a final mark of 14/20 for the report (17 (original mark) – 3 marks (late penalty) =

14/20 (final mark)).

For the purposes of this policy a weekend (Saturday and Sunday) will be regarded as two days.

No marks will be awarded for work submitted either: a) after the assessment has been returned to the

Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled please refer to UOW website or eLearning for the latest version

2014_Aut_CHIP915_FINAL Page: 5 of 7 Last modified: 21 February 2014

students or b) more than two weeks after the due date, whichever is the sooner. Notwithstanding this,

students must complete all assessment tasks to a satisfactory standard and submit them, regardless

of lateness or loss of marks, where submission is a condition of satisfactorily completing the subject.

Supplementary Assessments

Students can log on to SOLS and click on the link titled “Supplementary Assessment” to view any

applicable offers or use the following

link; http://www.uow.edu.au/student/exams/suppassess/index.html

System of Referencing Used for Written Work

The School of Nursing and Midwifery uses the Harvard system of referencing, unless otherwise

specified for a particular assignment – check ‘Details of Assessment Tasks’.

The Harvard system can be accessed via the Library homepage, Related Links, Referencing and

citing: http://www.library.uow.edu.au/resourcesbytopic/UOW026621.html.

ubmission of Assignments

Specific submission instructions have been included in the assignment details section of this outline.

Students are also expected to keep a copy of all their submitted assignments in the event that resubmission

is required.

Assessment Return

Assessments will be returned via eLearning within 21 days of the due date.

Section C: General Advice

Students should refer to the Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health website for information on

policies, learning and support services and other general advice.

University Policies

Students should be familiar with the following University policies:

a. Code of Practice – Teaching and Assessment

http://www.uow.edu.au/about/policy/UOW058666.html

Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled please refer to UOW website or eLearning for the latest version

2014_Aut_CHIP915_FINAL Page: 6 of 7 Last modified: 21 February 2014

b. Code of Practice – Research, where relevant

http://www.uow.edu.au/about/policy/UOW058663.html

c. Code of Practice – Honours, where relevant

http://www.uow.edu.au/about/policy/UOW058661.html

d. Student Charter

http://www.uow.edu.au/student/charter/index.html

e. Code of Practice – Student Professional Experience, where relevant

http://www.uow.edu.au/about/policy/UOW058662.html

f. Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Policy

http://www.uow.edu.au/about/policy/UOW058648.html

g. Student Academic Consideration Policy

http://www.uow.edu.au/about/policy/UOW058721.html

h. Course Progress Policy

http://www.uow.edu.au/about/policy/UOW058679.html

i. Graduate Qualities Policy

http://www.uow.edu.au/about/policy/UOW058682.html

j. Academic Grievance Policy (Coursework and Honours Students)

http://www.uow.edu.au/about/policy/UOW058653.html

k. Policy and Guidelines on Non-Discriminatory Language Practice and Presentation

http://www.uow.edu.au/about/policy/UOW058706.html

l. Workplace Health and Safety, where relevant

http://staff.uow.edu.au/ohs/index.html

m. Intellectual Property Policy

http://www.uow.edu.au/about/policy/UOW058689.html

n. IP Student Assignment of Intellectual Property Policy, where relevant

http://www.uow.edu.au/about/policy/UOW058690.html

o. Policy on Ethical Objection by Students to the Use of Animal and Animal Products in

Coursework Subjects, where relevant

http://www.uow.edu.au/about/policy/UOW058708.html

p. Human Research Ethics Guidelines, where relevant

http://www.uow.edu.au/research/ethics/human/index.html

q. Animal Research Guidelines, where relevant

http://www.uow.edu.au/research/ethics/UOW009373.html

r. Student Conduct Rules and accompanying Procedures or Research Misconduct Policy for

research students

http://www.uow.edu.au/about/policy/rules/UOW060095.html

Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled please refer to UOW website or eLearning for the latest version

2014_Aut_CHIP915_FINAL Page: 7 of 7 Last modified: 21 February 2014

Student Support Services and Facilities

Students can access information on student support services and facilities at the following link. This

includes information on “Academic Support”, “Starting at University, “Help at University” as well as

information and support on “Career’s and Jobs”.

http://www.uow.edu.au/student/services/index.html

Student Etiquette

Guidelines on the use of email to contact teaching staff, mobile phone use in class and information on

the university guide to eLearning ‘Netiquette’ can be found

at http://www.uow.edu.au/student/elearning/netiquette/index.html

Version Control Table

Version

Control

Release Date Author/Reviewer Approved By Amendment

1 20140217 Dr Sharon Bourgeois

(Subject Coordinator)

Miss Emma Purdy

(ADE Rep)

Final 2014 Autumn Iteration

he Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was passed into legislation in March, 2010. Identify the impact of this legislation on your nursing practice by choosing two key nursing provisions outlined in the American Nurses Association “Key Provisions Related to Nursing” summary

/in /by

he Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was passed into legislation in March, 2010.

Identify the impact of this legislation on your nursing practice by choosing two key nursing provisions outlined in the American Nurses Association “Key Provisions Related to Nursing” summary athttp://www.rnaction.org/site/DocServer/KeyProvisions_Nursing-PublicLaw.pdf?docID=1241&verID=1. Discuss how these two provisions have impacted, or will impact, your current practice of nursing.

COLL300 forum 2

/in /by

COLL300 forum 2
Develop a research proposal to include a research subject, a focused topic for the subject, a research question, sources to consult, hypothetical audience, and working thesis Remember: your thesis statement must propose an arguable solution to a problem related to your major about a topic related to your major or intended career, which follows the problem solution strategy. My intended career is being able to work for DOD – department of defense in the supply chain logistics field.
Description: Identify the main concern about your topic; include your research question and any relative secondary questions. You must include your working thesis statement, identifying it with the phrase: “My working thesis is….” You must also include the expected results of your research. Remember that a thesis statement is typically one complete sentence that is not a question.
Define the topic problem, illustrates an awareness of audience, examines and eliminates alternative solutions, provides a feasible solution, and supports all main points with adequate, documented research. The assignment reveals thoughtful analysis and critical thinking.