Discuss a situation in which an individual in this profession might be held liable for negligence.

/in /by

Paper 1: Professional Liability—select an allied health (nonphysician) profession; this can be your own profession or another profession that interests you. Some examples of allied health professions include physical therapy, respiratory therapy, pharmacy, nursing, physician assisting, radiography, ultrasonography, nuclear medicine, medical laboratory, medical assisting, phlebotomy, and many others. Also discuss ways to proactively avoid or prevent negligence in the profession that you selected.

Place your order now for a similar paper and have exceptional work written by our team of experts to guarantee you A Results

Why Choose US

6+ years experience on custom writing
80% Return Client
Urgent 2 Hrs Delivery
Your Privacy Guaranteed
Unlimited Free Revisions

identify how diet, nutrition and well being affects young children well being

/in /by

identify how diet, nutrition and well being affects young children well being

measures of child well being used in the uk and internationally
identify and describe theories on childrens well being

For a custom paper on the above topic or any other topic, place your order now!

What Awaits you:

On-time delivery guarantee

Masters and PhD-level writers

Automatic plagiarism check

100% Privacy and Confidentiality

High Quality custom-written papers

Identify patient who is seeking information about a specific disease process or diagnosis.
The following is the writing requirements for this assignment which shall be place unto four (4) Power Point Presentation Slides.
A. My name appears on the Scenario Power Point Slide/Slide # 1; Joel Reta, RN
I. Scenario Slide Example: This slide should include my name; Joel Reta. Next, outline briefly the scenario, then identify patient who is seeking information about a specific disease process or diagnosis. Be sure to include the nurse’s assessment of learning needs and the patient or family member’s readiness to learn. Be specific.

II. HERE IS THE SCENARIO TO BE USED IN SCENARIO SLIDE/SLIDE #1:
a. Scenario for Mr. Flores
b. Joel Reta, RN
c. Mr. Flores is an 88-year-old male recently diagnosed with colon cancer.
d. His wife has accompanied him to the oncologist’s office.
e. Both have a high school education.
f. Mr. Flores has no interest in his diagnosis; both his father and mother died at an early age from Colorectal cancer, and he believes nothing can be done for it.
g. Mrs. Flores is greatly interested in any treatment that might be available; she has been searching on the Internet for alternative cures.
h. Mrs. Flores has asked the nurse for help on how to determine whether a website is credible or not.

B. Only four (4) slides shall be submitted. Points will be deducted for additional slides according to my Nursing informatics Course Instructor. The four (4) slides pertain to the Scenario.
I. Slide/Slide #1: This slide should include my name; Joel Reta, RN. Next, outline a brief scenario, then identify a patient who is seeking information about a specific disease process or diagnosis. Be sure to include the nurse’s assessment of learning needs and the patient or family member’s readiness to learn.

II. Criteria Power Point Slide/Slide #2: NOTE: THIS IS THE ONLY SLIDE THAT REQUIRES A CITATION OF WHERE THE INFORMATION IS OBTAINED. This slide should address at least four criteria used to evaluate websites.
a. View Evaluating Internet Health Information: A Tutorial from the National Library of Medicine at: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/webeval/webeval_start.html

b. My assigned text (Hebda, T. L., Czar, P. (2012). Handbook of Informatics for Nurses & Healthcare Professionals, 5th Edition) and/or other references. The task is to explain how to determine the credibility of websites and teach it to the patient and/or caregiver described in the Scenario Slide. Concentrate on evaluation of the information, not how to conduct a search. Assume that the patient or caregiver has basic Internet searching skills, a computer in the home, and can enter words in the query box in a search engine, such as Google, Bing, Yahoo, and so forth. The idea is to teach your patients how to evaluate websites (suspect and credible) as they relate to a specific disease process or diagnosis.

c. The format of the criteria should be logical and easy to read, for example, a table, a checklist, or Q & A. Be creative! Language should be appropriate for the educational level of the audience, in other words, the patient and/or caregiver as described in the Scenario Slide.
III. Suspect Site Power Point Slide/Slide #3: This slide should give the name and description of a suspect website. The suspect website must be related to the disease or diagnosis identified in the scenario. However, the site does not meet the criteria for a credible site, for example, gives inaccurate information, and so forth. You must provide a working link to the site. Wikipedia is not acceptable! Explain why the site is suspect based on the criteria you outlined in the Criteria Slide.

IV. Credible Site Power Point Slide /Slide #4: This slide should give the name and description of a credible website that you would recommend to the patient and/or caregiver/family member. The website must be appropriate for the general public and address the disease process or diagnosis identified in the Scenario Slide. Avoid sites that are aimed at healthcare professionals. Explain why the site is credible based on criteria that you outlined in the Criteria Slide.
C. Make certain that the links for the suspect and credible sites are working and formatted correctly.
D. Punctuation and sentence structure are correct with no spelling or grammatical errors.

For a custom paper on the above topic or any other topic, place your order now!

What Awaits you:

On-time delivery guarantee
Masters and PhD-level writers
Automatic plagiarism check
100% Privacy and Confidentiality
High Quality custom-written papers

Describe the key differences between primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention programs. Next, discuss whether or not you believe these programs are effective. Provide support for your response.

/in /by

Using what you’ve learned this week, respond to the following prompts in your post:

Describe the key differences between primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention programs. Next, discuss whether or not you believe these programs are effective. Provide support for your response.

The death penalty is a serious punishment for committing a serious crime. In your opinion, what do you think should be the age for which a child could be put to death for committing a crime? Explain your reasoning.

And second discussion:SCI 115: Introduction To Biology,

Week 10 Discussion

“Effects on the Environment”

Note: Online students, please respond to one (1) of the following four (4) bulleted items.

Discuss three (3) positive and three (3) negative impacts of humans on the biosphere. Which positive and negative impacts do you believe are the most significant to consider. Justify your response.

Describe two (2) techniques required to study ecosystems then provide an example of each technique. Suggest two (2) advantages and (2) disadvantages for each of your chosen techniques.

Listen to the Ted Talk titled “Jane Poynter: Life in Biosphere 2” found here. Suggest three (3) lessons we can learn from this experiment then describe what you believe life will be like living in an extreme environment (e.g., underwater, outer space). Justify your response.

Read the BBC article entitled, “Global warming increases ‘food shocks’ threat” found here. Next in your own words define global warming and state three (3) effects of global warming that you believe will have the greatest impact. Lastly debate whether or not you believe that science could improve the nutrition of millions around the globe. Justify your response.

Please note that there are two different discussion questions that need to be answered. Also, for final payment only put the amount that is left after the handshake..no plag, and references

write your definition for each concept of the metaparadigm of nursing.

/in /by

write your definition for each concept of the metaparadigm of nursing. Which other concept would you add to the metaparadigm of nursing and why? Which one would you eliminate and why?

– Inferential Statistics Article Critique

/in /by

Inferential Statistics Article Critique

Read the article “Differential Effects of a Body Image Exposure Session on Smoking Urge Between Physically Active and Sedentary Female Smokers,”and identify the research questions and/or hypotheses as they are stated. Consider the following questions: What are the variables (sample sizes, population, treatments, etc.)? What are the inferential statistics used in this article? Were the proper steps of hypothesis testing followed?

Write a two- to three-page paper presenting the information listed below. Include a title page and reference page in APA style. Cite any references made to the article within the body of the paper in APA style. Your paper should begin with an introductory paragraph (including a thesis statement) and end with a concluding paragraph summarizing the major points made in the body of the paper and reaffirming the thesis. When writing the article critique, your paper must:

Determine what question(s) the authors are trying to answer by doing this research
Determine the hypothesis being tested and the concepts that were applied in this process.
Evaluate the article and critique the statistical analysis employed in the study.
Would you have included more and/or different variables? Explain your answer.
Examine the assumptions and limitations of the statistical study.
What would you have done differently in this case? Why?
Identify how the authors applied statistical testing to the problem.
Interpret the findings of the author(s) using statistical concepts.
You may access the Critical Thinking Community website for tips on how to formulate your thoughts and discussion of these questions in a logical and meaningful manner.

Writing the Article Critique

The Annotated Bibliography

/in /by

Objective: Assess sources for your research paper (for credibility, reliability and relevance) and list references in proper APA format

Assignment Instructions: The Research Project/Paper for this class is divided into three major Assignments, 1) annotated bibliography, 2) abstract, and 3) final paper. The first part is the annotated bibliography. An annotation* (see note on annotations vs. abstracts below) is a is a summary and/or evaluation, and your annotated bibliography will include a summary and/or evaluation of each of the sources (or references) you will use for your paper.

Your paper must include a minimum of three sources and these are to be included in this assignment, i.e. you are to write an annotation for each source. However you must use five or more sources in your final paper.

The reason the annotated bibliography is included as part of the research paper is because writing an annotated bibliography is important in that it provides excellent preparation for the final paper. One of the issues regarding any type of research, especially in the biosciences, medical, health/nutrition and exercise/fitness fields, is the credibility of the sources used, particularly those obtained from various websites. By forcing you to carefully evaluate each of your potential sources, the annotated bibliography helps you determine if in fact the source you chose is credible and also helps you determine how relevant it is to your topic and understand the topic better which will help you write your paper.

For this project, your annotated bibliography will include: 1) a complete citation for each source, 2) a summary of each source, 3) an assessment/evaluation of each source, and 4) a critique of each source. Three sources are required.

Citation:

Written in APA format. For more help with formatting, see APA handout.

Summary:

What is purpose of the source, review article, original research? What topics are covered? This is generally 1 -3 sentences that summarize the author’s main point. For more help, see this link on paraphrasingsources.

Assessment:

After summarizing the article (or research paper or book) it is necessary to evaluate it and also where you found it – its source (e.g. journal, website, etc). Briefly answer the following questions:

What is the format or type of source. How reliable is the information in the article and how credible is the source and the author(s)? Is this article biased or objective?

For more help, see this handout on evaluating resources.

Critique:

Once you’ve summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Why is this source relevant to your research paper and how can you use this source in your research project? What are the strengths and weaknesses? It is biased in any way? Compare the source with other sources in your bibliography.

*Annotations vs. Abstracts

Annotations in an annotated bibliography perform three functions: specify the source, evaluate the source, and critique the source. The annotation is a concise description of a particular source. It enables the researcher to establish the relevance of a specific journal article, book, research report, or government document, etc. Abstracts, on the other hand, are descriptive summaries that precede scholarly journal articles or can be found standing alone in periodical databases and are more detailed in this respect. Later in the course, Assignment 3 will specifically cover the abstract.

Additional Resources:

SampleAnnotated Bibliography

Also please see the resources below at The Owl at Purdue site for more information on how to write an annotated bibliography as well as other pages on the site to assist you with the other parts of the research paper.

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/01/

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/02/

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/03/

Levels of Measurement and Creating Survey Questions

/in /by

U2D2 – Levels of Measurement and Creating Survey Questions

After reading about levels of measurement in Chapter 4, search the Internet or the Research Library for examples of questions that measure each type of

variable.

Complete the following in your discussion post:

• Use the construct of yearly income to write a survey question, along with the possible answers, for each type of variable level of measurements; nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.

• Clearly label which survey question is nominal, ordinal, interval, or ratio.

Readings

• Program Evaluation Life Cycle – read transcript

Use your Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement text to complete the following:

• Read Chapter 4.

INTRODUCTION – Unit 2 – Program Evaluation: Quantitative Research Design

This unit continues your study of program evaluation. The activities will apply your new knowledge of research design to the evaluation of program

effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES

To successfully complete this learning unit, you will be expected to:

1. Explain strategies for measuring program effectiveness.

2. Understand variable level of measurement.

3. Explain the reliability and validity of measures.

4. Communicate through writing that is concise, balanced, and logically organized.

attachment
ProgramEvaluationLifeCycle.pdf
attachment
U2D2-09Instructions.pdf
attachment
Chapter4-CBPR-StepbyStep.pdf

Fluid, Electrolyte, and pH Balance

/in /by

Fluid, Electrolyte, and pH Balance

1. The maintenance of normal volume and composition of extracellular and intracellular fluids is vital to life. List and briefly describe the kinds of homeostasis involved.

2. Why does maintaining fluid balance in older people require a higher water intake than in a normal, healthy adult under age 40?

3. Why does potassium concentration rise in patients with acidosis? What is this called? What effects does it have?

4. Saline solution is used to reverse hypotonic hydration. Are body cell membranes permeable to saline? Explain your response.

5. Explain the renin-angiotensin mechanism.

6. Explain how ADH compensates for blood that contains too many solutes.

7. Briefly identify and discuss the characteristics of urine.

8. Briefly identify and discuss abnormal urinary constituents (i.e., substances in urine).

Remember to write your responses in APA format and include your references. This assignments must in your own words, no copying and lasting from different websites allowed.

Analyze two major factors that have influenced health care access and financing since the middle of the twentieth century.

/in /by

Topic : Analyze two major factors that have influenced health care access and financing since the middle of the twentieth century.
Write a 250-300 word paper using APA Format.
Use at least THREE references
References must not be less than FIVE years.

Books Required Contemporary Nursing: Issues, Trends & Management, 6th Ed* Author: Barbara Cherry DNSc MBA RN NEA-BC; Susan R. Jacob PhD MSN RN

The pillars of principalism represent the four areas of consideration that must be weighed when faced with an ethical dilemma. I would rank the four ethical principles in the following order:

/in /by

Comment 1

The pillars of principalism represent the four areas of consideration that must be weighed when faced with an ethical dilemma. I would rank the four ethical principles in the following order:

1.) Nonmaleficence

2.) Beneficence

3.) Respect for autonomy

4.) Justice

I believe that nonmaleficence, or the principle of not causing harm or purposeful wrongdoing onto others should be the highest ranking ethical principle (Grand Canyon University, 2015). Nonmaleficence is a core medical ethical standard but can also be applied on a broader spectrum throughout society. In a Christian, biblical narrative I believe nonmaleficence to be one of the strongest ethical pillars as well. Numerous biblical teachings and several the 10 commandments of Christian faith relate to the core concept of nonmaleficence (“Bible List Of The Ten Commandments,” 2017). Any consideration of nonmaleficence is likely to involve an examination of beneficence since they can often be considered inseparable. Beneficence is the principle of providing benefits to others. Respect for autonomy is the patient’s right to choose what happens to their body. Though this seems pretty straight forward, there is possibility for dilemma in cases where an individual is unable to make autonomous decisions. Autonomy can be seen as the limiter on how far a clinician can medically intervene for a patient. Justice is the principle of fair and equal benefits and treatment among all people. Justice may require an analyzed approach and comparison and is therefore in the lowest ranking but nonetheless a significant and crucial pillar.