A research paper of 5 to 7 pages about Hemophilia

With the;

1. the definition

2. the reasons

3. Symptoms

4. Methods of examination

5. the cure

6. Instructions

7. References

Applying an Ethical Theory

Please read these assignment instructions before writing your paper, and re-read them often during and after the writing process to make sure that you are fulfilling all of the instructions. Please also utilize the assignment guidance and the outlined model provided.

Overview
The following short essay assignment is designed to help prepare you for an important part of the Final Paper. In this essay, you will do the following:

Choose either the same ethical question you formulated and introduced in the Week One Assignment, or a different one based off the list of acceptable topics.
Choose either utilitarian or deontological ethical theory to apply to the ethical question.
Explain the core principles of that theory.
Demonstrate how the principles of the theory support a certain position on that question.
Articulate a relevant objection to that position.
Instructions
Write a five-paragraph essay that conforms to the requirements below. The paper must be at least 800 words in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. The paragraphs of your essay should conform to the following guidelines:

Introduction
The introduction should clearly state the ethical question under consideration, and define the essential issues. You may build upon the question and introduction you provided in the Week One Assignment; or you may choose a different question, but it must be based off the list of acceptable topics. Your introduction should include a brief remark about the kind of theory you will be using to approach this question. The last sentence of the introduction should briefly summarize the or position on the issue you think is best supported by this theory and succinctly state what the objection will be. Bear in mind that your essay will not be concerned with your own position on this issue, but what someone reasoning along the lines of the chosen theory would conclude; this may or may not be the position you took in the Week One Assignment.
Body Paragraphs
Each paragraph in the body should start with a topic sentence that clearly identifies the main idea of the paragraph.
Theory explanation
Explain the core principles or features of the deontological or utilitarian theory and the general account of moral reasoning it provides.
You must quote from at least one required resource other than your textbook that defends or represents that theory. Refer to the list of acceptable resources.
Application
Demonstrate how the principles or features of the deontological or utilitarian theory apply to the question under consideration and identify the specific conclusion that results from applying the reasoning characteristic of that kind of approach.
Your application should clearly show how the conclusion follows from the main principles and features of the theory as addressed in the previous paragraph. Please see the associated guidance for help in fulfilling this requirement.
Objection
Raise a relevant objection to the argument expressed in your application. An objection articulates a plausible reason why someone might find the argument problematic. This can be a false or unsupported claim or assumption, fallacious reasoning, a deep concern about what the conclusion involves, a demonstration of how the argument supports other conclusions that are unacceptable, etc. You should aim to explain this objection as objectively as possible, (i.e., in a way that would be acceptable to someone who disagrees with the argument from the previous paragraph).
Note that this does not necessarily mean that the objection succeeds, or that the conclusion the theory supports is wrong. It may be an obstacle that any adequate defense of the conclusion would have to overcome, and it may be the case that the theory has the resources to overcome that obstacle. Your task here is simply to raise the objection or present the “obstacle.”

Conclusion
The conclusion should very briefly summarize the main points of your essay.
Resource Requirements

You must use at least two resources to support your claims.
At least one of the resources should be one of the Required or Recommended Resources that represent the theory you have chosen, and must be drawn from the list of acceptable resources available in your online classroom.
The other source should pertain to the particular issue you are writing about and should be drawn from the required or recommended readings in the course, or be a scholarly source found in the Ashford Unversity Library.
You are encouraged to use additional resources, so long as at least two conform to the requirements above.
The textbook does not count toward satisfying the resources requirement.
To count toward satisfying the requirement, resources must be cited within the body of your paper and on the reference page and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
If you are unsure about whether a resource fulfills the requirement, or need assistance in finding resources, please contact your instructor

Minimum 350 Words

1) What is the impact of diploma mills on legitimate educational institutions? How does one check the credentials of learning institutions to verify legitimacy? What should one look for when selecting an institution of higher learning? 2) Provide the URL of at least two sites that discuss the impact of the Internet on any one of the concepts discussed this week and provide a brief review of the information contained there. Did you learn anything new? Were you surprised by any of the information presented on the site?

Strictly APA by the publication manual of the American psychological association 6th edition second practice. Write in Third person only. Special attention to the reference page, full reference. Verb/noun agreement. DNP [doctor of nursing practice level writing). Introduction and conclusions required. Use headings when needed. Thesis statement pivotal, conclusion critical. Please look at objectives below. Follow grading rubric strictly.

NU 610 Guidelines for Role Paper
The purpose of this paper is to explore the advanced practice nurses’ role in relation to healthcare policy, politics, and advocacy (Unit 1 objective).
The paper should be carefully written in formal style, based on primary resources, provide an integration of ideas. Organized flow, logical progression of ideas, and clarity in thought are essential. Paper should be no more than 3 pages in length, excluding the title page and reference page. Liberal number of references (minimum of 8 references).
Grading Rubric
Criteria
Points

Introductory paragraph (one paragraph). There must be a thesis statement that tells the reader purpose of paper and what will be discussed.
/0.5
Identify and discuss driving forces propelling the advanced practice nurse into the healthcare policy, politics, and advocacy arena.
/3
Discuss ways the advanced practice nurse can influence and advocate for healthcare policy and politics.
/3
Discuss the role of professional nursing organizations.
/3
Conclusions: Summarizes the essential points of the paper in one paragraph.
/0.5
Total Points
/10

Deductions:
0.25 point = each APA, grammar, punctuation, and spelling error
1 point = Document not submitted as pdf, or not named per file naming policy (see syllabus)
1 point = No turnitin report, paper and turnitin report not merged, or not merged in correct order
1 point = Over the page limit
Up to 20% of points = for lack of scholarship
20% deduction = Plagiarism or incorrect paraphrasing
Please upload your paper into the designated Assignment. Name your document per the course file naming policy, merge turnitin report, and submit as a single pdf document. Assignments not submitted properly will not be graded. If this occurs, you will be notified via email and will have 48 hours to resubmit correctly (after 48 hours pass, deductions will be made for late submission).
Papers must be submitted to turnitin.com and students are to review the report generated by this software system. Students will be given the opportunity to submit revisions of the paper to turnitin.com. The final report is to be saved as a pdf document and merged with the paper (in other words, you will be submitting one document).
The faculty is really sticklers about plagiarism, nonintentional and otherwise. We take this very seriously and are actively checking assignments. Submit your paper to turnitin.com in adequate time to get multiple reports back, if needed. The first report comes back very quickly. Subsequent reports, if you need to resubmit because your similarity index is high, take longer 24 hours, maybe more. Of course, 0% similarity is best, but realistically there will be names of people, reports, commissions, groups, models, books etc. that come back highlighted.

These are nothing to worry about since we cannot change these things (faculty do not worry
about those and neither should you). What we look for is text/content that comes back
highlighted and matches another source (even if the content is referenced appropriately). The
turnitin report is to be used as a learning tool, therefore, it is essential that you look at the report’s
percentage as well as what is highlighted. Simply looking at the score does not determine
whether sentences or correct paraphrasing was done, it only tells you a number. You need to look
at the specific areas highlighted. Look at your work and see what content is highlighted and
determine if you can change the wording without changing the meaning. If you can, then you
need to re-word accordingly. If your paper is similar to another student’s work, and you feel there
was no way you could have known this person used these same words, you still need to revise
your wording. Each student’s submission to turnitin is unpublished at the time, and could
potentially be published, just as your own work could be published. At some point, if you were
to submit your work for publication and not revise the content highlighted originally in your
turnitin report, a plagiarism violation could occur if the other student’s work is also published.
Delete your title page and reference pages before submission so you can get a true snapshot of
your paper and possible problem areas. Use the revision opportunities with turnitin.com if you
have highlighted areas of similar content. Instructors check those and there’s no need to have a
red flag on your paper. Also, refer to the section in the APA formatting manual about plagiarism,
it has some good points. Plagiarism.org is another good resource.
Scholarship Expectations
Up to 20% of points will be deducted from grade for lack of scholarship. Scholarship is
evidenced by organized and logical progression of ideas; effort and attention to detail is evident;
communicates effectively all aspects of discussion. Correct grammar, spelling, and word choice.
Liberal number references (minimum of 4 references). References are current, appropriately
paraphrased, and cited. Correct use of APA. Correct title page.
You are clinical nurse scholars in the making. You are the advanced practice nurses/DNPs and
members of the highly literate profession of advanced practice nursing who will chart the future
of health care. Good writing ability is as much a required skill for nurses in advanced practice as
performing clinical functions. Therefore, precision and scholarship is expected in all
assignments.
UNIT objectives
Broadly outline the history of healthcare, policy, politics, and nursing in the United States
2. Discuss the regulatory, legal, and credentialing requirements for Advance Practice Nurses (APN).
3. Discuss the advanced practice nurses’ role in relation to healthcare policy, politics, and political advocacy.
4. Outline the legislative policy process – how a bill becomes a law.